For a number of years now, I have watched part of the Republican party that has as its main, if not sole, purpose, to dismantle government. They called the Democrats bluff with the sequester which so far has appeared to have little effect. Who cares if a military base can’t afford fireworks or if the Blue Angels can’t afford to do a fly over? In the big scheme of things, those are pretty unimportant. But now more and more federal workers are being furloughed. For example, local HUD (Housing and Urban Development) offices are closing for five Fridays in July and August. That is 5 Fridays that staff will not be paid. This is money that won’t be spent on a vacation or for car repairs or for food and clothing – all things that add to the economy. (Here is an interesting website that tracks furloughs.) And while a number of agencies have figured out ways to avoid furloughs, many workers will still be affected – still more if Congress can’t manage to pass a budget for the fiscal year that begins in October. The loss of incomes will slowly begin to mount.
But it isn’t just the failure to produce a budget. A recent New York Times editorial summed up the issue quite neatly. They called it a refusal to govern.
On two crucial issues this week, the extremists who dominate the Republican majority in the House of Representatives made it clear how little interest they have in the future prosperity of their country, or its reputation for fairness and decency.
The two issues are immigration reform and the removal of the food stamp program for the House agriculture bill.
These actions show how far the House has retreated from the national mainstream into a cave of indifference and ignorance. House members don’t want to know that millions of Americans remain hungry (in an economy held back by their own austerity ideology), and they don’t want to deal with the desperation of immigrant families who want nothing more than a chance to work and feed themselves without fear of deportation.
On both issues, in fact, many House Republicans are proudly asserting that they will stand in the way of any attempts to conduct a conference with the Senate. That might, after all, lead to a compromise.
And it isn’t just in the House.
Few things sum up the attitude of the current crop of Republicans in Washington than their loathing of conference committees. On issue after issue, they have passed radical bills and then refused to negotiate. On Thursday, for example, Senate Republicans refused for the 16th time to allow the Democratic Senate budget to be negotiated with its dangerously stingy counterpart in the House.
On immigration, House members fear a conference with the Senate would add back the pathway to citizenship that they consider a giveaway to undesirable non-English speakers. The eventual House border bills “should not be handed to a conference committee so that they can be reconciled with the Senate bill,” wrote Representative Tom Cotton of Arkansas in The Wall Street Journal on Thursday. Instead, he and others say, the Senate should be forced to take up whatever the House produces.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell may believe that ending the filibuster with a majority vote will spell the end of the Senate and cause Harry Reid to be remembered “as the worst leader of the Senate ever”, but in my opinion, the continuous use of the filibuster has already come close to destroying the Senate. Everything should not require 60 votes.
The New York Times editorial ends with this
A refusal to even to sit at a bargaining table is another way of refusing to govern. The nation’s founders created two chambers for a reason, but Republicans, in their blind fury to harm the least fortunate, are forgetting even those fundamental national values.
This is why the most recent Quinnipiac poll shows that while 53% felt the President was doing too little to compromise with Congress, a whopping 68% felt the Republicans leaders in Congress were doing to little to compromise with the President. And everyone thinks Congress is dysfunctional blaming both parties.
There is something called the greater good and I think many in Congress, particularly Republicans, have forgotten that ideal.
Photograph: Christopher Gregory/The New York Times
- Blog Running – ‘Mitch McConnell’s problem: How can he threaten to obstruct the Senate even more’? (thelastofthemillenniums.wordpress.com)
- Republican filibuster derails student loan bill (maddowblog.msnbc.com)
- Public knows Republican obstruction is the problem (dailykos.com)
- Democrats March Closer to Changing Rules of the Senate (usnews.com)
- IL Immigration Reform Advocates to U.S. House Leadership: Take Up The Senate Bill (progressillinois.com)
- House GOP on Immigration: Our Way or the Highway (washingtonmonthly.com)
- Reid vows ‘nuclear option’ to end nomination filibusters (upi.com)
- Mitch McConnell’s problem: How can he threaten to obstruct the Senate even more? (washingtonpost.com)
Many humble thanks for the link.
The Constitution ‘frames’ our ‘social contract’ and one aspect of America’s ‘social contract’ is ‘promote the general welfare.’.
For Republicans that are now living in fear of being primaried by the extreme teabagger faction, there is no ‘general welfare’.
It is ‘small government’, everybody for yourself.
Thank you for your comment. Our social contract has deep roots as our founders knew.