After John Boehner decided to walk out on the debt talks on Friday (and John, we know that it was not because of the President, but because Eric Cantor said no taxes even if you call them tax reform), we moved even closer to default. So a little humor (from the left) on the situation for Sunday morning.
So, who needs permisson for what? What should a woman have to do to have an abortion? Should the President live in South Dakota or Kansas and have to follow those rules to declare war. I think the President should notify Congress (which he hasn’t). As Congressman Mike Capuano explained
Article I, section 8 of the Constitution, and the War Powers Act of 1973, states that unless a crisis threatening our security requires immediate action, only Congress may authorize the use of force. I firmly believe that the Constitution entrusts Congress – not the President acting alone – to decide when to put U.S. troops in harm’s way. The President has not yet fulfilled his obligation to seek Congress’ approval to continue military operations in Libya.This decision was not easy, but I feel very strongly about this matter and I don’t expect that the Administration will decide to seek Congressional approval at this point. I also want to make it very clear that my concerns go beyond one President and one war. In fact, I am more concerned about future Presidents who may wish to bring this country to war based on insufficient facts. There is no more important matter than war and peace, and the Constitution is very clear on this matter. I appeared on CNN earlier week to talk about the lawsuit; you may watch the interview here: http://inthearena.blogs.cnn.com/2011/06/15/capuano-u-s-action-in-libya-illegal/.
But I’m not sure that Mike was envisioning this! Maybe it is time to rethink the War Powers Act to meet the current day defition of war. Maybe it should include actions taken as part of a NATO or UN mandate. Maybe it should include actions with no “boots on the ground.” War has changed since the 1970’s. Let’s think about this.
The Democrats never had a chance at overcoming the non- facts repeated over and over by the Republican-Tea Party coalition. Tom the Dancing Bug explains.
If you don’t see Ruben Bolling regularly, check him out. There is a new one every week.
I find it interesting that, like the infamous Joe the Plumber, Americans worry about what happens to the rich because they may be rich themselves someday. It is an ingrained part of our national psyche. Perhaps the President compromise on the tax cuts should be raising the middle class cut from $250,000 to $400,000 or thereabouts. And we need to work on the tax code if people are making that much as a business and still filling on their personal tax returns. We probably need some kind of small corporation category for filing added to the tax code.
The discussion in the Lame Duck Congress should be interesting since the Republican Tea Party did run on reducing the deficit and keeping the tax cuts for those making over the $250,000. I want to see their math as it seems keeping the cuts for the very top earners adds to the deficit without helping to pay it down. This will be high on the agenda when Congress returns to session On November 15. It should be fun.